Oct 312007
 
beyondreanimator.jpg

Herbert West has a problem. The world just doesn’t appreciate his genius, so much so that he has been rotting in jail after his previous experiments into reanimating dead flesh got a little out of hand. But now thanks to a new prison doctor with an agenda of his own, Dr. West may be able to finally complete his work.

Horror movies sequels almost always follow the law of diminishing returns and this is no exception. The first Re-Animator movie was a fantastically dark comedy; this film veers slightly more towards goofy satire but is still pretty watchable if not actually very creepy.

The DVD box claims that it is based on a story by H.P. Lovecraft, perhaps there should be a Oscar for “least faithful adaption of a written work”. In particular, I don’t think Lovecraft ever envisioned a fight between an animated severed penis and a angry rat.

Not too bad if you like this sort of thing.

Oct 302007
 

Talk about bad luck! The week before Apple’s latest and greatest operating system is released, my MacBook hard drive decides it can no longer go on living. As I result, I have lost a years worth of email and photos just days before. If the hard disk had waited just a few more days then everything would have been safely backed up using the new Time Machine feature in MacOSX.5.

Let me begin by saying that Time Machine is not the last word in backing up, you can definitely buy better software. However, Time Machine may well be the prettiest piece of software ever created for any purpose whatsoever, so much so that I am actually looking forward to accidently deleting something in the future.


Time Machine Restore Screen
Restoring files with time machine, pity you can’t see the moving starfield in the background

Although it looks great, and works well, Time Machine is a little strange compared to other backup tools. The Mac filesystem has no equivalent to Windows’ Volume Shadow Services, so you cannot literally roll back a folder transparently. What Time Machine does is take periodic snapshots of your entire hard disk and stores it on another volume, usually some type of removable USB drive.

The first backup you take is basically a copy of your entire filesystem (the files are not compressed and can actually be accessed in the finder). Every half hour after that, time machine will create a new backup directory and copy any files that have changed.

Much of the implementation is done with UNIX-style links to directories, so that files that have not changed since the last backup are not re-copied. This has some important implications (both good and bad) that I have not seen mentioned anywhere else:

GOOD: The entire filesystem is stored so it is simple to do a complete recovery if your entire hard disk fails.

GOOD: The backup directory structure is so simple that you don’t even really need the fancy flying-through-space GUI to get your files back.

BAD: Links to folders are not supported on any other filesystem other than MacOS. This means you have to reformat your backup drive. Which leads to:

BAD: Very limited network support. Wouldn’t it be awesome to have everything backed up to a network share? Why yes, yes it would! Well you can’t – unless your network share supports links to folders – which it doesn’t (well, if you are running your share off Leopard Server it does – but you get the point).

BAD: Backups are only done every half an hour hourly, and only 1 backup is kept for each day earlier than 24 hours ago. Other backup tools backup every file as soon as it is saved.

GOOD: Unless you are stupid and backup to another partition, your backups are on a different physical drive that will hopefully survive whatever calamity that destroyed your data.

Although it is not the mythical perfect backup software, Time Machine is a very useful addition to MacOS. The very fact that it is bundled with the OS and very easy to set up is sure to save many hours of tears and frustration for Mac users.

Oct 142007
 

A grisly unexpected death occurs in a 14th century Italian monastery that is shortly to be the venue for an important political and theological debate between the Franciscan order and the representatives of the pope. One of the visiting Franciscan monks has arrived early, and his analytical mind is well suited for the challenge, which is lucky because the bodies soon start mounting up.

The Name of the Rose
CSI: 14th Century Italy was the least popular of the CSI spinoffs

This is one of that rare breed – a film the captures the spirit of a great book. The whole thing plays out like a Sherlock Holmes mystery, and the monastery setting allows for all sorts of secret passageways and lantern-lit skullduggery. Sean Connery stars as William of Baskerville (presumably somewhere in Scotland), but the real draw is the scenery. I don’t know where it was filmed, but the whole thing looks fantastic. Although not as detailed as the book, the film manages to include all the various details of life in the monastery and the theological thinking of the time. This all makes for much better viewing than it may sound.

Name of the Rose
“You have paid the price for your lack of vision”

Highly recommended