Animoog is a really cool synthesizer emulator for the iPad that simulates the electronics of the old analogue synths that ruled the 70s before digital came along and ruined everything. The interface is a little daunting but it comes will a bunch of useful presets, and the UI encourages exploration with lots of knobs to twiddle and hidden panels to discover.
The awful secret I have discovered is that if you make an interesting enough sound (which isn’t hard to do) then any collection of notes sounds good. At the moment I am sitting on my pouch in the shade recreating the Blade Runner soundtrack by pressing random keys. That Vangelis was a terrible hack!
Apple announced a whole bunch of stuff today; an iPad for little people, an iMac so thin you can shave with it, and some kind of hard drive technology that actually looks pretty cool. But buried amongst the big announcements was the fact that you can now buy new books through iBooks in New Zealand.
The iBook store has been open in New Zealand from the beginning, but up until today only offered free, out-of-copyright works to NZ accounts. These are all very well but sometimes you just want to read the latest paperback and buying an ebook is certainly convenient. I don’t mind paying for a good book and up until now I have been forced to go through Amazon’s (pretty good) Kindle service. But it is nice to have another choice.
Let us look at some prices, taken from random titles in the various new and featured sections:
|Graham Henry:Final Word
||n/a (coming soon)
|The Vampire Diaries: The Hunters: Destiny Rising
|The Casual Vacancy
|Fifty Shades of Grey
|A Dance with Dragons (Complete Edition)
(All prices are in NZ dollars. iBooks lists things in NZ dollars and presumably charges GST. Amazon prices are in US dollars but I have converted them using the current exchange rate)
In this random selection of titles from recent “featured” titles, it seems that Amazon is mostly cheaper but not always so it pays to compare. Also, Amazon still has a better selection (Graham Henry’s book being a rare example of something on iBooks but not yet on Kindle), often with multiple editions of the same book available. As always, it pays to shop around.
Now all Apple has to do is hurry up and open the New Zealand TV store. We have waited long enough.
Apple’s network of shopping locations has been amazingly successful. I suspect they only got into retail in the first place because their products were always relegated to the back shelves in the normal computer stores, and even stores that specialised in Apple gear were strangely useless. For years it was almost impossible to find Apple hardware in any retail space in New Zealand at all.
Having their own retail space enables Apple to introduce products directly to customer without having to convince distributors to stock them, something that used to be a lot harder before Apple’s recent successes. My guess is that Apple Stores exist for that reason (and possibly branding) alone – retail space is expensive and I bet Apple makes no more profit on a iPad bought at an Apple Store compared to the same iPad from the Dick Smith next door.
What ever the reason, Apple’s relatively recent and totally proprietary secret strategy of selling products that people actually want at a price they are prepared to pay is paying off in spades.
These are the competing Microsoft and Apple stores at the Valley Fair Shopping Center in San Jose. The Microsoft store is actually larger and more conspicuous than Apple’s and seems to have about the same number of staff. What it doesn’t have is many customers.
Personally, I am not sure why Microsoft has a store. I can’t think of a product that I would buy that I couldn’t get more easily from somewhere else, and Microsoft’s products have never had the same strong branding that Apple’s have. Even the Windows8 phones are better purchased through a phone company.
Maybe I just passed by at the wrong time, but I can’t see the Microsoft stores lifting Mircosoft’s brand (or profits). Microsoft has never had the problems Apple had getting it’s products into the market when it created the stores, and I just don’t see the point.
I got an email from my hosting company (OpenHost – I like them) a couple of days ago telling me that this site had exceeded it’s allocated bandwidth for the month. I found that very unlikely since I pay for 2gig a month and never even get close to that. But investigation revealed it to be true:
188.8.131.52 - - [24/Aug/2012:05:59:03 +1200] "GET /blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/muriwai_gannets-1024x494.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 19040 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 008/0.83; http://www.80legs.com/webcrawler.html) Gecko/2008032620"
184.108.40.206 - - [24/Aug/2012:05:59:04 +1200] "GET /experiments/sketchthispage HTTP/1.1" 301 492 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 008/0.83; http://www.80legs.com/webcrawler.html) Gecko/2008032620"
220.127.116.11 - - [24/Aug/2012:05:59:04 +1200] "GET /blog/tag/48hours/ HTTP/1.1" 200 13939 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 008/0.83; http://www.80legs.com/webcrawler.html) Gecko/2008032620"
18.104.22.168 - - [24/Aug/2012:05:59:04 +1200] "GET /blog/tag/programming/ HTTP/1.1" 200 33193 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 008/0.83; http://www.80legs.com/webcrawler.html) Gecko/2008032620"
22.214.171.124 - - [24/Aug/2012:05:59:06 +1200] "GET /blog/tag/wii/ HTTP/1.1" 200 9771 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 008/0.83; http://www.80legs.com/webcrawler.html) Gecko/2008032620"
126.96.36.199 - - [24/Aug/2012:05:59:06 +1200] "GET /blog/tag/horror/ HTTP/1.1" 200 8668 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 008/0.83; http://www.80legs.com/webcrawler.html) Gecko/2008032620"
This is a small fragment of a logs generated by a web crawler that I had never heard of before – 80legs. A large proportion of the traffic this site gets is via bots, and normally I don’t mind. It is usually search engines indexing the contents – something I want to encourage. But 80legs decided for some reason to repeatedly download this entire site repeatedly, for no discernible reason as far as I can see.
They are very proud of their “grid computing platform”, but I think that the individual members don’t talk to each other much since I see different machines downloading the same information simultaneously. Most bots take the trouble to slowly spider a site over a few days, but 80legs just seems to charge ahead. Worse, it re-downloads data it has already seen such as images linked from multiple pages. What ever the reasons, 80legs might end up costing me money and I can live without it.
So long, 80legs.
I generally enjoy using Google+ – I find it serves a different purpose than Facebook. Facebook is all about friends and family swapping pictures and gossip, while G+ has evolved into a sprawling market of pet projects and technical discussions. With a little bit of work you can find people and communities whose interests match your own, and either passively follow or interact as you please.
But Google has got to do something about the Explore feature. This is supposed to show cool posts that many people have commented on,reshared, or +1ed. All sorts of random, interesting stuff shows up here. Unfortunately, so does a lot of “+1 if you like cookies” rubbish does as well, and it makes G+ seem like a bunch of idiots.
Part of the problem is an interesting difference between the design of G+ and Facebook. On Facebook it has become common for people to use a Facebook app to post a large picture to containing a (usually inane) slogan to their wall for anyone to see. These are hard to ignore in your news feed, but since they are posted by a third party app you can easily block them and all future posts from the same source without un-friending the sender. Almost nobody manually posts these pictures since the app is easier and doesn’t pollute your own photo albums.
But on G+ it is easy to attach a single photo to a single post, and G+ will helpfully show a very large version to all your followers. Unlike Facebook apps, there is no way to block similar posts except by unfollowing that user or at least moving them to an out-of-the-way circle. And there is no way at all to disable these posts in the Explore section of the site, which has become a bit of a bore now that it has been invaded by self-promoters posting unoriginal content as large images.
If Google really want to improve G+, they should take a look at curating the Explore section to discourage posts of low value, even if they have many comments or +1s.
Or perhaps I am just bitter because nobody +1s me.